Community Health Advocacy Essay

The aspects of residential atomic bet 18a and pairing total are closely connected and volume tend to social occasion the experimental conditions inter variety showably. The best way to explain the difference surrounded by the cardinal concepts is by ex adenylic acidles to differentiate and get a clearer under standing of the difference between the two concepts. This paper go forth define core and fellowship large-minded a brief support from current literature. The paper will in any case examine and give the differences between the two terms plus render and identify the chosen amount based on the health fall out of purport disease. The Christoffels three layers of a conceptual textile for advocacy will be traced. Then each lay out as an aggregate selected is described.Community and conflate Terms DefinesIn confederation health plow care for, aggregate is defined as the whole population, which is being used to describe a effrontery environment. The term aggregate is used to refer or define a group of bulk in a lodge who are believed to have uniform or common businesss and challenges in their life. These people should share similar characteristics and excessively they should be living in the corresponding area. The group which is to be described should be suffering from the same aesculapian or health dread problem and should be in set out care of similar medication or health care services. Aggregate in nursing vista literally is defined as the entire, whole, or the sum of a given group with similar problems, (Nies & McEwen, 2010).Differences Between Aggregate and Communitythither are those people who use the term companionship when referring to aggregate. Aggregate and community are two different concepts just now are closely connected. Community in nursing health care setting is used to refer to the general population in a given area. A community is the entire population that includes the pass and healthy pop ulation. When discussing close the aggregate, we refer to the population, which is experiencing a health condition along with those who are prudent of taking care of the group that are stray. The entire population that conciliate of healthy and sick in the society is referred to as the community, (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2009). determine Aggregate and Description as a health Issue at that place are those people who use the term community and the term aggregate to refer to the same thing or to mean something the same. There stand significant differences between the term community and the term aggregate. When we talk of aggregate, we are referring to a population, which has similar medical problems or challenges and live in the same region or geographical area. For the community, its the general population that involves the sick and those who are not sick. In this case, Adults suffering from heart disease in Illinois is an aggregate population that is used to define the current h ealth care challenges. In the state of Illinois, specifically the Sangamon county community, evidence shows that heart disease is the number one reason for death of adults in the entire state of Illinois and in Sangamon county (Illinois De dampment of Public Health IDPH, 2010).Christoffels Three Stages of a conceptual Framework for Advocacy Christoffels three stages for advocacy include culture, strategy, and action. The stages take place concurrently. The origin stage, schooling, includes naming, describing, and measuring the usual health problem. The second stage, strategy, involves employ the information in the first stage to snap off a be after of action for the promotion of public health. The stage includes. This stage involves the communication of information to the public and health care professionals. Groups can then be assembled to digest on the issue and project needed changes. Strategies can include public education messages, campaigns, and press conferences. Thi s action may involve fund raising, persuading individuals to change their lives, and polity involvement.To achieve action, changes in mindsets, behaviors, and resource provision. Public health advocacy transpires at two levels the individual/family level and in the larger community level (Christoffel, 2000). Advocacy that focuses on the interpersonal or intrapersonal level is frequently referred to as patient advocacy. Patient advocacy involves any activity that benefits a patient (Torrey, 2010). It can apply individual patient care, groups that develop policies, and legislation changes to improve the health care system for patients. There are umpteen examples of patient advocacy organizations, which include government groups such as the concentrate for Disease Control, American Heart Association, and individual patient advocates who act as healthcare assistants (Torrey, 2010).Applying Each Stage as an advocate for the AggregateThe first stage in the Christoffels advocacy fr amework talks close to the information factor. The information names, describes, and measures the public health problem. When discussing the issue of heart disease. This stage can be used to describe the disease process, the risk factors knobbed, and its complications. During this stage, the private sector or the government sector get involved so as to develop the question needed that can be used to measure the public health problem. Evidence shows that this stage is relevant simply because it assists develop all statistical information and results that are competent in order to address the advocacy challenge. The first stage in Christoffels advocacy framework is to develop a research on heart disease within the society. This stage will help develop relevant information on the mortality rate related to heart disease and/or its complications (Christoffel, 2000).The second stage in Christoffels advocacy framework is the stage of strategy. Having collected relevant information abou t the problem of health care issue, the second stage helps work on the information so as to understand the problem completely. In this stage, the central root word is to get results that will help come up with some strategies on how to approach the health problem. Experts in rateive fields translate the research findings so that proper results are developed to develop a plan of action (Christoffel, 2011).The third stage in Christoffels advocacy framework is the stage of action. Strategies, which are developed in the second stage on how to handle the health issue are implemented and monitored in the concluding stage of Christoffels advocacy framework (Christoffel, 2011). It is alleged that when strategies in stage two are implemented and monitored they provide the best results in respect to the health care environment, (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2009). Public health messages on the intelligence information and posters can help educate the community about heart disease. There a re also local physicians who provide free learning seminars on specific diseases. Raising funds to help with campaign measures can also be implemented during this stage. Legislation can be educated on the health issue to convince policy makers to get involved. The main part of this stage is action. The goal is to influence people to change specific habits that will reduce the risk of developing heart disease.ConclusionThe aspects of community and aggregate are closely connected, and in most cases a lot of people tend to use them interchangeably. These two terms are used interchangeably, but they have different meanings. There are those people who use the term community and the term aggregate to refer to the same thing or to mean something the same. There stand significant differences between the term community and the term aggregate. Aggregate is the populations that has similar health problems and are seeking similar health care services, but the community is the entire population that carries the sick and the healthy. The use of Christoffels advocacy framework helps solve a problem in accordance.ReferencesChristoffel, K. (2011). Public health Advocacy Process and Product. American ledger of Public Health Illinois Department of Public Health. (2010). Leading causes of death, Illinois, 2010. Retrieved from http//www.idph.state.il.us/health/bdmd/leadingdeaths10.htm Nies, M. (Mary Albrecht), & McEwen, M. (2010). Community/public health nursing promoting the health of populations. Elsevier/Saunders Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2009). Foundations of nursing in the community community-oriented practice. Mosby/Elsevier