Approaces in normative ethics Essay Example for Free

Approaces in prescriptive morals EssayThere are three major approaces in normative morality including virtue morality, deontological ethics, and utilitarianism. This paper is going to compare the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. It will include a description of the differences in how each theory addresses ethics and morality and it will also discuss an experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories.Differences In How These Theories phone Ethics and Morality impartiality ethics, deontological ethics, and utilitarianism are the three major approaches in normative ethics. Virtue ethics emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, while deontology emphasizes duties or rules, and utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of actions. Virtue ethics is also called agent-based or character ethics. According to Boylan (2009), when using the virtu e ethics approach, one should take the viewpoint that in living their life they should approximate to cultivate excellence in all that they do. It encourages people to develop their character as the basis for the good life. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, meaning that the moral value of an action is fixd by its outcome.Utilitarianism suggests that an action is morally right when that action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternative (Boylan, 2009). Deontological ethics judges the morality of an action based on the actions adherence to a rule or rules. This form of ethics uses rules and duties to determine what is right. Deontological ethics is contend to consequentialism. Deontology maintains the wrongness of actions resides in the kind of action that it is, rather than the consequences it brings about. A deontologist, for example, would find the act of killing an frank man wrong simply because it is the killing of an innocent man. A cons equentialist might find this action wrong because it deprives someone of future happiness and causes grief to a family.Virtues, Values, and Moral ConceptsFor individuals who follow the deontology theory, they must apply obligations and rules to their ain conduct. An individuals obligation is to make sure they pay their bills. This helps them to support their family, which is an obligation to people who accept this kind of lifestyle. Some individuals accept not to follow this path in life. A person could easily look at an electric bill and throw it off to the side, and instead, take the money and gamble it away. This would not be the causal agent for a deontologist. A deontologist follows their obligations. A person who follows the theory of a deontology also has to think about virtue, value, and moral concepts. There really is no way to dampen the three, as they all play into the same hand. When confronted with a moral or ethical dilemma, virtue, value, and moral concepts all pla y a part in an individuals opinion process.ConclusionThere are three major approaches in normative ethics virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and deontology. All of these theories are used by mankind to determine what is right and what is wrong. Whatever theory an individual accepts to use as their guide, it is important to accept one of these theories in an effort to help ourselves and mankind.ReferencesBoylan, M. (2009). Basic ethics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall. Hursthouse, R. (2010). Virtue Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition). Retrieved from http//plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=ethics-virtue