Thursday, May 2, 2019
Leadership in Organisations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
Leadership in Organisations - attempt ExampleGood leaders are in a position to establish suitable decisions that channelise the attainment of their objectives. This is because of the existing effectual communication skills, self-confidence, and the capability of managing others (Badaracco, 2006, p. 47-55). The author continues to argue that a society can non be alienated from good leadership (Badaracco, 2006, p. 47-55). Leadership has been linked to the shape and outcome of a society since what the leaders do is replicated to what the members of the society will do as well. 2.0. Monologues in V Act 4, Scene 1, lines 227-281 2.1. succinct of soliloquy From the monologue, it is evident that hydrogen the king is willing to send his soldiers to the battlefield. With his ability to disguise himself as a vernacularer, it is difficult for the common people to see and recognize him. This he does by borrowing a rotten old cloak that he uses to move around (Shakespeare 2007, p.108). He is also seen to claim to be a kinsman of Fluellen though he despises him as a captain. His leadership qualities allow him to consult the common soldiers about the struggle (Shakespeare 2007, p.108). Despite the fact that the soldiers were doubtful about the kings ability to lead them to contend, King Henry is quick to motivate his soldiers to go to the battlefield under his leadership. Some of the soldiers like Williams also questioned the erectification of the war with France. Despite Henrys leadership skills in being in constant communication with the soldiers, Williams, just like any ordinary person would, questions the king persistently and argues that if they die and leave their windows, it would be inexcusable for the king (Shakespeare 2007, p.109). However, the king responds by saying that he would be responsible for any death of his soldiers as it was their responsibility to guard the nation. Since a leader is bound to face all manners of rejection, Henry is not worried but defends himself from Williams. It is after the bitter exchanges between the king and the Williams that the soldiers leave for the battlefield (Shakespeare 2007 p.110). 2.2. Analysis of monologue Looking at Henry V act Act 4, Scene 1, lines 227-281, Henrys mystic dialogues with his warriors reveals the close relationship between the king and ordinary man who are the soldiers. In this scene, the author presents several(predicate) types of voices that talk in Henry V exposing how every soldier interacted with Henry, therefore, adding a contemporary dimension to the acquaintance of the difficult emperor. Henrys discussions with his soldiers feature the team spirit between leader and his subordinate, and this promotes a common understanding between the two groups (Shakespeare 2007, p.110). Henry knew that he was the same as the other common people. The barely difference was that he was a leader, and he interacted with them in a free manner without threatening them. In the monologue, Henry described the unpleasant tasks of power, which both separate and exposed the king, where all the subjects give the impression of place all their uncertainties, worries, and responsibility to the kings shoulders.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment