The hegemonic decline of the United States and the eastward shift in the global capitalist economy

AbstractThe neat receding of 2007-8 has utterd the inherent flunk of the western sandwich economies, whose harvest-festival had been open fireled on heavy indebtedness. This dissertation int block offs to broach the implications of the spectacular recess of 2007-8 by applying the conjectural concepts related to the opinion of hegemony in localise to determine to what extent there is a geo goernmental monger in pop outy favour of china, pursuant to the drop of the join States. The dissertation similarly utilizes the surmisal of frugal crisis in regulate to ascertain the implications of the grand recess and settle the idea of a hegemonic touch to the East.ObjectivesThe dissertation seeks to intervene in a central debate of our clippings in the field of governmental miserliness of International Relations the execut qualified decline of fall in States hegemony and a possible shift of hegemony towards East Asia, especially of importland mainland china, giv en East Asias maturation affair in the population miserliness. This trend has exacerbated since the onset of the great Recession of 2007-8. Using the theoretical framework of hegemony, I intend to attend appear to which extent the universalisation of the stinting super mental synthesis renders the imprint of Ameri terminate hegemony obsolete. A Marxian model of variation bottom potentially shed light into the reasons which china, with competitive advantages that vastly come ab disclose those of the united States exit continue to put in index number and hit itself as the new hegemon.Research questionsWhat is the best counselling to conceptualise hegemony at the worldwide train in the context of the broad Recession of 2007-8?What elements buzz off to be analysed in order to assess hegemony shifts in Capitalist Global Political EconomyHow does this apply to the crisis 2007-2008?What be the signs that American power decliningWhat are the potential implications of that decline?Did the Great Recession of 2007-8 create an irretrievable hegemonic shift towards the Pacific? supposed frameworkThe dissertation is divided into two parts. The for the root time is theoretical and discusses the notion of hegemony at the external level. The second part elabo puts on the theory of crises. The way in which hegemony has been conceptualised by influential authors much(prenominal) as Arrighi, Cox, Organski and Kindleberger is critically psychoanalysed. In particular(prenominal), the dissertation proposes a re-reading of Gramsci stressing the role of nation states and both elements, coercion and consensus, in the exercise of hegemony. Concerning crises, the dissertation seeks to elaborate an integral and organic theory of economic crises storeyd on Marx, contrasting the latter with recently developed neo- bolshy perspectives, such as the ones espo workd by David Harvey and Ernest Mandel.MethodologyThe method for tackling this dissertation provide g et hold of a theoretical treatment of hegemony and the causes of economic crisis. Within that particular methodological framework, I intend to analyse the Great Recession of 2007-8 and its implications for the shift victorious place, with the transfer of hegemonic power from the United States to China. Chapter one will be a treatment of the theoretical sources commodeing with the notion of hegemony, as applied to shifts in the international governmental system. Chapter two deals with the nature of economic crises and long economic cycles, as applied to the hegemonic shift taking place. Chapter three will examine the hegemonic shift taking place as a result of the Great Recession of 2007-8 and how the next long cycle could favour the transition from a US-dominated system to a Chinese-dominated one. I intend to use primary sources which will corroborate the economic and policy-making decline of the United States as intumesce as the rise of China, and analyse my findings done t he prism of the Great Recession of 2007-8. I will also utilise theoretical material (as defined above) in order to examine to what extent there is a hegemonic shift taking place within the context of the ongoing economic crisis of the United States and the wolfram.Literature reviewRobert Cox uses the Gramscian notion of hegemony in order to expose the structures which arise from shifts in the organisation of the international economy. These structures are kept through with(predicate) consensual and coercive power relations. These power relations are label by ideologic practices which give it an aura of normality, whence establishing a particular heathen hegemony. Significantly, Cox argued that although specific states may be the bearers of hegemony, at its almost fundamental level the term relates to the rooting of a set of elites in different countries that ack straightwayledge certain essential principle on the international economy (Cox in Gill, S. (Ed.), 1993 42). Accordin g to Arrighi, hegemony becomes the added power that a dominant associate has as a result of world able to universalise the issues which are satisfactory of foregoing to action (Arrighi in Gill, S. (Ed.), 1993 148). A state capable of exercising hegemony if it is able to lead the international political system in a particular direction and it is perceived by other states as pursuing the interests of the international community. However, the dominant state could also be interest in leading other countries into their own way of economic development (Arrighi, 1990 367). Arrighi argues that the competition for resources that promoted the capitalist expansion of the European economy into the wider world is morphological rather than conjunctural. Its strength resides in the ability to provoke creative destructions prompt by economic crises, giving rise to the technological breakthroughs that have preserve the process of world(prenominal)ization (Arrighi, 1998 128).Organski desc ribes the rise of a hegemonic order in a situation in which powerful nations as well as center and minor powers accept the given distribution of power and wealth and stick to the analogous guidelines when it comes to diplomacy and commerce (Organski, 1969 354). The international order that arises achieves its legitimacy through the ideology which underpins the power differentials between the different states. When a power shift occurs, it may be accompanied by conflict amongst the great powers. This would in truth much depend on whether the contest seeks to overhaul the rules of the game in the international political system (Organski, 1969 354). Gilpin operates with a more deterministic notion of hegemonic cycles, positing that the resolution of a hegemonic war represents the start of another period of reaping and eventual decline of a great power (Gilpin, 1981 210). Kindleberger argues that the need to have a hegemon stems from the idea that only a dominant power can provid e collective goods. He maintains that the main danger that the international political faces is not the representence of too much power accumulated in one single hegemon but the presence of too some informal riding states unwilling to exercise authority (Kindleberger, 1981 253).Gramsci re-examines the Marxian model by positing that the cultural and political base of a particular familiarity is necessarily informed by the economic superstructure. The base includes categories such as the legal system, the predominate ideology, the political make-up of the state and the cultural values of society. These categories are not involved in the production of goods but legitimate the ways in which the productive forces shape society through nimiety value extraction. Gramsci finds that the power of the dominant class goes faraway beyond the competencies of the state as it extends to the obliging society, via institutions like schools, the press and cultural practices. The dominant cla ss maintains hegemony by coopting the genteel society, which is imbued with a particular ideology which ensures that the political status quo remains anchored in society and that it legitimates the way the productive forces operate (Holub, 1992 103).Marx attributed the emergence of economic crises to the end of the rate of bread to fall (Marx, 1863). The requirement to provide the workforce with extract wages put limits on the exchange value of the labour capacity. This limits the surplus labour time and surplus value needed for the accumulation of profits. thither is a requirement that capital be transformed in consumption, therefore placing another burden on the process of production. Limitations on the production of use value by the requirement to create exchange value and the needed of private profit before the satisfaction of social needs intend that there will be overproduction. Capitalism attempts to create the conditions to resolve the knowledgeable contradictions of capitalism, such as the creation of a credit system. However, according to Marxist theory, crises are temporarily resolved until a higher level of economic crisis is attained (McCarthy, 1990 240). 1 of the ideas which Harvey puts forward in relation to the rise of neoliberal forms of globalisation is the policy of accumulation by constructive eviction, resulting in the centralization of economic wealth and political power in the trades of a very reduced number of people through policies of dispossession. These policies imply discovery the publics of access to wealth. More precisely, accumulation by dispossession entails the practice of monetaryisation, privatisation, upwards state redistribution and the manipulation of crises. Harveys work is notably linked in an indirect manner to the ideas postulated by prominent public intellectuals of the Left such as Naomi Klein and Noam Chomsky, who also highlight the symbiosis between accumulation (upwards) and dispossession (downwards ). These ideas attend to hark back to the classical Marxian template of a dialectical between the owners of the means of production and those who sell their labour at a fraction of its cost, living permanently in the realm of necessity (Harvey, 2005).Mandel maintains the base/superstructure Gramscian symbiosis in its analysis of hegemonic relations in the post- orbit War dickens era, claiming that it ushered in a long-wave economic cycle of growth. The running(a) class had been trimmed by the effects of Fascism, which focused on the cooperation of the different social classes, and dry land War Two. Technology had increased the rate of profit, which produced impressive economic growth and accumulation of capital. design on Gramsci, Mandel claims that it is impossible for the working class to nonplus civil society from a war of position as this would lead to reformism instead of creating true change. Any attempt to seize the control of society must be done using a war of maneo uvre. The working class, as a subject of social change, is not capable to produce society in a hegemonic way, as it has always been economically and culturally disenfranchised. Any revolutionary process of change must be resolutely quick. A drawn-out conflict would inevitably lead to an accommodation with the middle class (Mandel, 1995 28).The theory of economic crisis is linked to the notion of hegemony in its political aspects. Transformations taking place in the international economy, particularly those of the magnitude of the Great Recession of 2007-8, have the potential to create a fracture in the hegemonic order constituted after the end of the Cold War. To be sure, there is a process of political and economic convergence which arises out of the increased level of interconnectedness amongst states. This process of harmonisation has been marshalled by the marriage between land and the waive market orientation typical of the American political temper which emerged amidst t he triumphalist furore of the early 1990s (Fukuyama, 1992 338). This emerging geostrategic situation steered the hegemonic passage taken by the United States towards an expansion of its political personality to the wider world. The Great Recession of 2007-8 created a situation in which the tenets which sustained that hegemony have been broken. China and the Rest (i.e., the non-Western world) have been ripening at a healthy rate whilst the West is still mired in an economic crisis which does not seem to have an end. This dissertation will endeavour to united both theoretical frameworks in order to determine to what extent the economic crisis will pay back a change of hegemonic order. The most crucial aspect to be analysed is whether China will be able to rework the notion of hegemony (which is a Western concept) in order to emerge as a potential challenger to the American dominion over the international order. The Great Recession of 2007-8 will potentially undermine the American array capabilities, which is the main element to be considered in the analysis of a putative hegemonic shift in favour of China. In addition, China seems to be interested in propping up its military capabilities. However, its geopolitical emphasis seems to be on forging commercial connect with the Rest, rather than launching a frontal hegemonic challenge against the United States (Jacques, 2009 22). subject area study The Great Recession of 2007-8One of my research questions explores the possibility that the Great Recession of 2008 created a hegemonic shift towards the Pacific, specifically China. In some respects, the first stage of globalisation (1990-2008) was successful in creating an extensive network of international governance. The end of bipolarity gave rise to the ability to interconnect mankind by electronic means (personal computers, internet, fast processing of data). Globalisation has also created a union of ideology amongst the nations, such as the concept of libera l democracy and free markets (Dilly, 1992 59) Although some countries deviated from the norm of untrammelled capitalism after the localised fiscal crises of the 1990s (Russia, Argentina, etc), by and large there has been a trend towards ideological harmonisation, which also includes a growing concern for human rights. This is true for many countries, notably first world ones. The first stage of globalisation created an mutualness that internationalised production and consumption. Whilst the outsourcing of production created benefits for consumers, it also rendered nations incapable of protecting their resources, which are now shared with the rest of the world through its management by multinational economic interests, and managed their economy for the benefit of its populations. As Bobbitt argues, the market-state ushered in by globalisation has as its main purpose the maximisation of opportunities for its citizens instead of protecting their welfare (Bobbitt, 2002 347). Since eco nomic considerations have overtaken political ones, the increase rate of capitalist profit in the East means that China will continue to accumulate power due to its strategic competitive advantages, lower wages, a untested labour force and a huge internal market.The challenges posed by the Great Recession exceed the capacity of individual states to be able to defend themselves. There is no nation, in the incipient stage of globalisation, which can act as steward and caretaker of the system. For example, the total flow of capital in the derivative industries vastly exceeds the size of the major economies of the world like the United States, the European Union and China ($531 tn as of September 2008). In addition, the first state of globalisation was chaotic, horizontal and disorderly. Globalisation brought in many confident(p) elements for the world population, but also created many negative offshoots, which territorial states cannot possibly tackle on their own. The effects of g lobal warming and natural resources degradation, the circularize of disease, nuclear proliferation, humanitarian catastrophes and the threat of terrorism has one the one hand exposed the vulnerability of nation-states and created the need for common global action by international institutions that significantly erode their political sovereignty (Basch, L. et al, 1993 67) The imperial overstrech that the United States suffers from has resulted in the accumulation of massive debts, which now total more than cytosine% of its GDP. In addition, its economy is about to be overtaken by China, which is still growing at very high rates (Jacques, 2009 139).The second stage of globalisation will result in the erosion of hegemonic power of the United States. The Great Recession of 2008 provides an opportunity to recreate the global financial and economic structure as well as create more centralised supranational governance, as seen in the rise of the G20. One of the ways in which the crisis keeps warming down the political sovereignty of the nation-states is seen in the depreciation of the US dollar mark (the international reserve currency) due to the indiscriminate printing of money (Jansson, 2001 44). One of the ways in which the second stage of globalisation could bring in a world-state is through the creation of currency harmonisation, possibly based on special drawing rights. The increased indebtedness of nations also harmonises the system towards a world-state, since the nation-state has to rely on a debt-based economy. The socialisation of banking losses through taxpayers dollars is also another variable to be reckoned with. The increased fragility of the system at local level creates greater opportunity for extra-national and supranational intervention. To be sure, the role of the nation-state has not gone away. However, their role is subordinated to the requirements of this progressively emerging extraterritorial financial and economic structure. The re sponse to this emerging harmonisation towards a world-state is already being seen in the different arrangements made between BRICS nations and commodity-rich countries seeking to renew the dollar as a medium of exchange (Suominen, 2012 33) In turn, this will end up hurting the most powerful sovereign nation, which will find it increasingly difficult to maintain military hegemony without the ability to print out as many dollars as it needs. The erosion of political sovereignty as a result of the Great Recession of 2008 and the reaction to it by the stand by valet goes hand in hand with the idea of privatisation of economic power, managed at supranational and extraterritorial level by powerful private concerns (Khanna, 2008 41). These supranational concerns are in the process of setting up their own regulatory schemes, imposed on individual territorial states, which are finding it increasingly difficult to resist them. My preliminary findings show that the realignment of economic i nternational systems is the main conduit by which harmonisation leading to an hegemonic shift in favour of China will be activated. In addition, there is a definite reaction by what I would call the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation bloc (notably China and Russia, but also the likes of India and Iran). The harmonisation process is proceeding apace in the West. This reaction in the Second World is generating its own kind of harmonisation. The political sovereignty of nations could also be supercharge impaired by the conflict that will arise as a result of it. Trying to quench the logic of anarchy brings with it the possibility of conflict. As Schmitt put it, the political cannot exist outside the realm of conflict. It is expected that the United States will not let China accumulate the necessary military capabilities in order to establish itself as the new hegemon.Preliminary findingsThere are several factors which enables us to think that a hegemonic transition is taking place. A massive, imposing flourish of Chinese-constructed fighter aircraft and other military equipment was used to commemorate the 60th anniversary of communist Chinas founding, on 1 October, 2009. At the same time, Chinas space industry was rapidly burgeoning and continuing to develop. along with the fact that the Chinese economy continued to expand during a global recession and a rising position on the world political stage, these technological advances indicate Chinas movement towards the status of a world superpower. While the rest of the world struggled in 2009, the Chinese economy exemplified a remarkable flexibility in returning to significant growth. The Chinese government attributes this economic resilience to Chinas blend of collectivism with capitalism, in contrast to the laissez-faire approach taken by the West (Guthrie, 1999 122).In early 2009, a migration of millions of workers from urban areas to rural locales resulted from the closure of factories that produced exports o n the east coast and south coast of China. The steep price of fuel and food had put pressure on household budgets in 2008, and in order to halt inflation, stringent financial and credit policies were set in place. These policies caused the construction industry to dip, as well as a slouch in the property market. In response, the Chinese government created a stimulation package in November 2008 that was worth 4 trillion yuan (about $586 billion). round 50% of the stimulus package was set aside for improving infrastructure, such as railways and airports, primarily in rural regions, while a further 25% was designated for the Sichuan province, which had been severely affected by a May 2008 earthquake and was in need of rebuilding. Banks were ordered to increase lending, and the result was a 164% muckle of loans in the first three quarters of 2009. This facilitated a rebound of the economy, which occurred far more quickly than in other countries. (Wright, 2010 221). Additionally, th e latter part of the course of instruction saw the recovery of exports, which set China up to overtake Germany as the top exporter world-wide. As a result, speculation grew as to whether China could convalesce the dominant position that it once held prior to the early 1800s, at which time it provided roughly one third of manufacturing in the world, compared to just 25% of manufacturing in the West. This outcome was rendered more probably by a trade deal with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations that transpired at the end of the year. As the worlds largest creditor, China had a symbiotic and mutually beneficial family with the U.S., the globes biggest debtor, that had become vital in the effort to rebalance the global economy. Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) issued a statement on 23 March 2009 that called for an international currency that would replace the U.S. dollar as the primary global currency and would remain uncommitted to individual cou ntries he argued that this currency would have increased stability over time. The Peoples Bank of China also proposed that Special Drawing Rights, which were designed in 1969 by the IMF for utilisation between international institutions and governments, king be employed on a wider scale and used as payment in international finance and trade transactions. This would reduce fluctuations in price and the risks associated with these fluctuations. The initiative was made again at the yearly throng of Eight (G-8) summit that took place in Italy in July 2009. Delegates from China, India, Brazil, Mexico, and South Africa (also cognize as the Group of Five) were also invited to the summit, where China, along with India and Russia (a G-8 member) called for an overhaul of the global financial system and a halt to dollar domination. In the latter part of September 2009, the president of the World Bank, Robert Zoellick, cautioned that the U.S. dollar faced an increasing threat due to the risi ng force of both the euro and the Chinese yuan. At this conjugation China had surpassed Japan as the main creditor of the U.S. there were concerns coming from capital of Red China that the $800.5 billion value of U.S. Treasury securities, along with other assets that constituted 60% of Chinas foreign-exchange reserves and 30% of foreign-exchange reserves globally, would be rarefy by American debt and decreasing confidence in the U.S. dollar. China presented a temporary solution, which was to resist purchasing U.S. Treasury stock and, more significantly, to assist the utilisation of the yuan as a world currency. (Kim, 2010 49).Bibliography Arrighi, G., Capitalism and the modern font World-System Rethinking the Non-debates of the 1970s examine (Fernand Braudel Center), Vol. 21, No. 1 (1998), pp. 113-129Arrighi, G. The Three Hegemonies of Historical Capitalism, Review (Fernand Braudel Center), glitz 13, Number 3 (Summer, 1990), pp. 365-408Basch, L. et al (1993) Nations Unbound Tr ansnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States, Gordon and Breach, capital of the United KingdomBobbitt, Philip (2002) The Shield of Achilles War, Peace and the Course of History. spic-and-span York, Alfred KnopfBryson, J. Nick, H., Keebie, D. and Martin, R. (1999) The Economic Geography endorser Producing and Consuming Global Capitalism, Wiley, cutting YorkDilly, R. (1992) Contesting Markets Analyses of Ideology, Discourse and Practice, Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghFukuyama, F. (1992) The Last Man and the force out of History, Free Press. New YorkGill, S. (Ed.) (1993) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGilpin, R. (1981) War and tilt in World Politics, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGuthrie, D. (1999) Dragon in a Three-Piece match The Emergence of Capitalism in China, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJHarvey, D. (2005) The New Imperialism, Oxford University Press, OxfordHolub, R. (1992) Antonio Gramsci Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism, Routledge, New YorkJacques, M. (2009) When China Rules the World The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order, Penguin Press, New YorkJansson, B. (2001) The Sixteen-Trillion-Dollar Mistake How the U.S. Bungled Its National Priorities from the New Deal to the Present, Columbia University Press, New YorkKhanna, P. (2008) The Second World, Penguin Books, LondonKim, Yong-Ki, The Rise of G20 and Koreas Response , SERI Quarterly. Volume 3. Issue 4 October 2010, pp. 49-66Kindleberger, C. Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy, International Studies Quarterly 25(2) (1981), pp. 242-54Mandel, E. (1995) Long Waves of Capitalist Development, Verso, LondonMarx, K. (1863) The Capital, Volume III, http//www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/index.htmMCCarthy, G. (1990) Marx and the Ancients Classical Ethics, Social Justice, and Nineteenth-Century Political Economy, Rowman and L ittlefield, Savage, MDOrganski, A.F.K. (1969) World Politics, Knopf, New YorkSuominen, K. (2012) Peerless and Periled The Paradox of American Leadership in the World Economic Order, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAWright, T. (2010) Accepting Authoritarianism State-Society Relations in Chinas Reform Era, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA