Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Do you struggle to find equilibrium between excelling at work and sheding productive, quality while with loved unmatchables at lieu? With the engineering science that is available in the twenty root century, it is now accomplishable for better professionals to decide whether they would like to work from scale and collaborate with family members to oppose work demands. Alesia capital of Alabama is an African American Ethnographer who wrote Kitchen Conferences and Garage Cubicles The Merger of berth and Work in the 24-7 Global Economy.This study was one of many a(prenominal) published in 2008s book entitled The Changing adorn of Work and Family in the American Middle Class Reports From the Field, which focused on providing insights into the changing nature of working families in the United States (1008). capital of Alabamas main argumentation is that todays modern fraternity and spheric deliverance have enabled families to merge work and fundament in quasi-entreprene urial ship canal (1018), which ordain in turn deepen the attachment between family members.Her unoriginal yell is that the merging of these two worlds does non come without a d stimulateside your alkali will no longer serve as a prophylactic from caper pressings (1018) and job demands may be made more trespassing(a) by the use of innovative communication technology (1019). The main character of this essay is to identify and analyze capital of Alabamas main and tributary arguments, to describe two types of complement she uses, how they help her submits, and to identify her intended consultation.capital of Alabama proposes that transformations in gender relations, management strategies, and expert practices (1018) play integral roles in the opportunities for families to decide how to combine or balance their home lives with work demands. She goes on to state that womens access to equal education and equal date opportunities have expanded the possibilities for spousal co llaboration in technical professions (1010), and that existence able to collaborate on work projects at home will score a more intimate and interdependent family.She then provides statistics covering the percentage of women graduating with a degree in engineering jumped 16. 5% in just 30 years (1011). The statistics provide hard evidence to her claim that women atomic number 18 gaining increasing access to technology based jobs, and appeals to the readers logos. Montgomery spent a period of five years in the field following a braces in their thirties, who were subsisting in one of these collaborative, job-sharing (1012) middle class families in order to obtain a view of the world from their perspective (1008).Basing her argument off this research provides a stronger emotional touchion to the paper than if Montgomery were to use sweeping generalizations passim. Montgomery structures her essay in a narrative format, writing in the first person. She was successful at attempti ng to appeal to her audiences ethos by devising her writing less formal while keeping an educated voice. The writing opens with an introduction to Marjenah and Steve, who sh be a home with Marjenahs parents in te Valley.Montgomery appeals to her readers pathos by illustrating the familys world Emails, faxes and phone calls conjugated their home to high tech firms within Silicon Valley. Although there were no park lots or numbered suites, their neighborhoodwas, in some sense, a engaged industrial park (1009). Montgomery recalls the different modes in which they blaspheme upon each other, and states that the interdependence this family possesses is an opportunity for each member help one other handle job demands.She details the countless nights Steve spent on his wifes projects after get toting home from his job as well as the way Marjenah was needed to proof read Steves reports and to review her mothers paperwork for her department store job. The father worked at an outside tech firm, but served as the familys technical support (1016). This ethnographic research directly relates to her main point that equality in the education within a family has enabled collaboration in the home, and allows us to spend more time with those we love.Combining the statistics that show women gaining access to technical jobs are increasing with the representation of a modern, job-sharing family that include both sexes collaborating on high tech projects helps validate the essays argument. Montgomerys goal is to predicate families of new opportunities on how to balance work and home life, so in order to provide a full picture she explores the potential downsides to living in a modern job-sharing family.Montgomerys secondary claim states that working collaboratively on job tasks at home (1018) will maturation family cohesion (1018), but that this combination will in turn pass on the idea of your home being an escape from job pressures. She helps substantiate this argumen t by referring again to the subjects of her study, an emotional appeal. Steve summarized his perception of the situation, explaining that job demands limited the stop that they had over the time and space of family life (1019).Montgomery makes her audience connect to this point on an emotional level by describing the conflicts the couple undergo because of the stresses their job-sharing created. She details Marjenah having to constantly manage sounds (1015), as well as the couple getting into arguments over the amount of energy each puts into one a nonhers work, citing that sometimes the main incentive for them to make up was the pressure of work calling again. It is clear to the reader that Montgomery is simply make an argument to explore this alternative lifestyle.She uses many different types of support throughout her writing in order to make her argument more informative two will be analyzed further. Montgomery continuously includes professional opinions with quotes from past studies that are on the same topic as her own work. This gives the reader necessary background knowledge on the topic, by allowing the audience to have a more complete understanding as to how the economy has been playing a role in the decisions we make regarding how we balance our lives, since the industrial Revolution.She opens with a quote from nineteenth century author John Ruskin, which states home will only be home, until the anxieties of the outer life penetrate into it (1008). This grabs her readers attention, and provides a possible thesis for her writing. Montgomery explains separating work and home life has not always been the normal ideal, talent her reader a brief history on the transformation of family labor from agrarian to high-tech work (1010). She does this with quotes and ideas from over ten different sources, many of the sources she chose are know in the fields of Anthropology and Sociology.This is extremely helpful for her ethical appeal, because it shows Montg omery took the time to gain an understanding of the contextual relevance of her selected topic. Some of the work she cites claims things such(prenominal) as In the early twentieth century, corporations supplanted many family firms, credentialed engineers replaced informally clever mechanics, and big sciencerose to prominence. (1011) and that Industrial transformationsincreasingly removed outturn from the home, while cultural transformations valorized home as a haven from the acetous work world (1010).This relates to the quote she opens with, because Ruskin was one of the numerous writers pushing to get the rising middle class to embrace this new ideal (1010), aggrandisement the question of the motives behind said quote. Including other pieces of writing that claim technology is what played a key factor in changing the way individuals and families balanced their two lives, historically, helps her introduce the idea that separate spheres are not necessarily the to the highest deg ree desirable family and work forms (1018). Montgomery uses examples to support her arguments, which helps create a mental image in her audiences thought while reading her work.Her research gathered while with Marjenahs family, is her most used example, and is a real effective form of support. In Montgomerys eyes, Marjenahs family exemplifies how new technologies, management strategies, and gender relations are changing the possibilities for work collaborations within households (1012). She refers to their specific situation as a way to in the flesh(predicate)ize Montgomerys generalized emphasis on womens equality in education and job opportunities as being the main factor in society once again cock-a-hoop families the option to draw in and collaborate on work.She uses examples while giving her audience background knowledge of this topic. She starts with an example describing how employers relied upon fathers to discipline family work units in some early factories (1010). She ma kes the claim that shop-keeping families saw kin as sources of income (1010), more specifically using examples such as the bakers wife iced cakes a few steps from her husband, the butcher and his son chopped join on the same counter, and for the family of grocers home and work merged (1010).These examples support her bid that the separation of spheres was neither decisive nor abrupt. (1010). Montgomery does a sufficient job regarding the amount of support she provides her audience with to back up her argument. Every writer has an intended audience. Montgomerys study was published in a book that has a goal to highlight how culture shapes family life during devious social and economic landscapes, so it should address a fairly educated audience.The background information provided implies that she was keeping in mind the fact that not everyone who picks up her book will have an understanding of the different norms our society has gone through regarding the separation of work and hom e life. To conclude, Montgomery was very successful in presenting her argument that contemporary gender relations, management strategies and technological practices enable divers family and work formsFar from weakening family bonds, these mergers of work harbor family cohesion (1010).She appealed to her audiences logos by providing facts, statistics, expert opinions, and by citing other pieces of work on her topic. This also helped her ethical appeal, as did the personal afterward detailing her background and her credentials. Using the example of Marjenahs family, on with the baker, butcher and grocers, helped Montgomery emotionally appeal to her audience, and to get her point across. Overall, Montgomery presented her argument very clearly it was fact based, and very informative which makes her exploratory purpose a success.